|
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| Chappy | Posted: 2005/12/11 1:13 Updated: 2005/12/11 1:13 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/8/17 From: Rowlett, TX Posts: 20 |
I implemented this and it seems to work fine...as far as I can tell. No fuss, no mess...
Thanks for the heads up... |
| tl001 | Posted: 2005/12/31 11:42 Updated: 2005/12/31 11:43 |
Webmaster ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/6/10 From: Posts: 282 |
It seems the codes added into header.php are not as effective as we would have expected.
The following codes seem to be working. (remove the codes in header.php) Add a new rule into .htaccess (your server must allow mod_rewrite) Please note that noaccess_to_prefetch_accelerator.php is a non-existant file so the server would return a 404 code to the browser. Based on reading from the net, this seems to be the proper way of doing it. It will stop Firefox 1.0.7 and most times Firefox 1.5 with Prefetch ON. It still does not stop those browsers with accelerator ON, but the server will return 404. It will alleviate the heavy pressure on the datasebase because of the rapid-fire database queries generated by the evil prefetch. It is not perfect - it would be if Firefox 1.5 with or without prefetch were to be banned altogether. Sometimes, ... |
| sven423 | Posted: 2006/2/21 3:42 Updated: 2006/2/21 3:42 |
Just popping in ![]() ![]() Joined: 2006/2/21 From: Posts: 1 |
Well, I just had to register to comment on this...
Have a look at: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/netlib/Link_Prefetching_FAQ.html There you can see: the webmaster is fully able to control which sites are being prefetched by using rel="prefetch" in link-tags. Ones without rel="prefetch" are not going to be prefetched. So why do you want to block Firefox? People on other sites (http://www.entartete-kunst.com/?p=657) are already starting to complain about that. Do you really want to block 20 per cent of your visitors? The only thing left is that Google uses prefetching for the first result in its searches. and that's a really nice thing which makes surfing a lot faster, imho. I'm also a webmaster of several sites. And I don't care about this little bit of traffic due to prefetching if it makes the web better for users. |
| tl001 | Posted: 2006/2/21 8:44 Updated: 2006/2/21 14:52 |
Webmaster ![]() ![]() Joined: 2004/6/10 From: Posts: 282 |
Quote:
How so? Google/Firefox must be extremely nice to you than to me?? This site has the simplifiedURLs implemented and prefetch was crawling the site like a rapid-fire extremly bad behaving crawler and even worse, some of the prefetching totally disregarded previously crawled contents. Quote:
I am not blocking firefox, only firefox with prefetching ON. If it would take banning firefox to save myself from being banned by my host, then I would do that. A fast and speedy response depends on two factors: your Internet connection and server specs. Nowadays, almost everyone has a broadband connection and many of the servers are pretty fast. Even prefetching does work, what would you gain while in the process of making a mess with the host server? Those using prefetching, to me, are a selfish bunch with no regard what their actions would do to the servers. Losing those visitors is not a concern to me. To increase servers' responding speed is the responsibility of the webmasters. NOT Google's and Firefox's! So hands off. |





